Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Bant Beanstalk , Bant Enchantments , Bant Omniscience , Bant Synthesizer , Domain Zur Overlords , Mono Blue Reenact , Simic Aggro , Simic Bounce , Simic Merfolks
Meta Performance Analysis
Willowrush Verge ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Willowrush Verge is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 35.56 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Willowrush Verge has a win rate of 76.2%, making it 2.4% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unable to Scream | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 74.3% | 3 |
| Herd Migration | Sorcery | 9 | 62.7% | 1 |
| Aegis Turtle | Creature — Turtle | 5 | 58.3% | 2 |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 7 | 57.9% | 1 |
| Loot, the Pathfinder | Legendary Creature — Beast Noble | 13 | 55.5% | 5 |
| Reclamation Sage | Creature — Elf Shaman | 6 | 55.4% | 1 |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 17 | 53.7% | 4 |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 21 | 51.4% | 6 |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 50.0% | 2 |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 48.9% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Willowrush Verge than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 7 | 92.9% | 75.5% | +17.4% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 5 | 87.5% | 74.6% | +12.9% |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 2 | 8 | 88.0% | 75.2% | +12.8% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 5 | 88.9% | 76.5% | +12.4% |
| Auroral Procession | Instant | 2 | 5 | 100.0% | 88.1% | +11.9% |
| Rakshasa's Bargain | Instant | 6 | 6 | 87.5% | 77.9% | +9.6% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 10 | 80.8% | 75.5% | +5.2% |
| Awaken the Honored Dead | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 5 | 81.8% | 79.0% | +2.8% |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 6 | 73.9% | 72.0% | +1.9% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 11 | 77.4% | 75.9% | +1.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temur Otters | 28 | 8.3% | 49.2% |
| Unknown Archetype | 21 | 5.8% | 34.5% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 16 | 1.2% | 37.2% |
| Simic Terror | 13 | 4.2% | 9.3% |
| Sultai Emergence | 5 | 13.5% | 28.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.