Pyroclasm

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Gruul Aggro mogged 9-1 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892
Jeskai Oculus crazymorango 8-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907
Jeskai Oculus darth_vaner 8-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053
Jeskai Control scipios 8-1 None
Jeskai Control soulstrong 8-2 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865
Rakdos Aggro bunnyfat 7-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765740
Izzet Spellslingers platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025
Jund Delirium platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025
Jeskai Oculus platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025
Temur Beanstalk platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
+2.8%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
82.5%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
+4.5%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
176
decks
Tournament Results
76
1st place
109
top 8
Average Copies
1.8
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Pyroclasm ranks #134 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 33%).

Game Impact Factor
84.12
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
+15.44%

Red average: 62.1%

Performance compared to other Red cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Pyroclasm is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.

Recommended number of copies: 1

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
38.8
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
0.52x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 24.04 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Pyroclasm has a win rate of 77.6%, making it 3.9% better than other 2-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Up the Beanstalk Enchantment 7 59.3% 1
Pawpatch Formation Instant 9 48.4% 0
Overlord of the Hauntwoods Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror 5 46.7% 1
Screaming Nemesis Creature — Spirit 25 45.5% 4
Get Out Instant 14 45.2% 0
Destroy Evil Instant 18 45.2% 3
Sunspine Lynx Creature — Elemental Cat 6 42.9% 1
Fear of Missing Out Enchantment Creature — Nightmare 22 42.8% 4
Break the Spell Instant 12 40.3% 0
Obliterating Bolt Sorcery 13 40.3% 0

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Pyroclasm than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Innkeeper's Talent Enchantment — Class 2 7 87.2% 72.9% +14.3%
Authority of the Consuls Enchantment 1 5 88.9% 77.5% +11.4%
Pawpatch Formation Instant 2 15 85.7% 75.6% +10.1%
Shore Up Instant 1 8 90.0% 79.9% +10.1%
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor 4 12 84.7% 75.6% +9.1%
Ral, Crackling Wit Legendary Planeswalker — Ral 4 6 86.7% 77.6% +9.1%
Preacher of the Schism Creature — Vampire Cleric 3 12 83.6% 75.1% +8.5%
Pawpatch Recruit Creature — Rabbit Warrior 1 13 83.9% 75.4% +8.5%
Cut Down Instant 1 9 83.3% 75.8% +7.6%
Tishana's Tidebinder Creature — Merfolk Wizard 3 22 82.4% 75.3% +7.1%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Gruul Aggro 622 29.9% 50.1%
Red Deck Wins 306 22.2% 51.7%
Jeskai Oculus 239 81.6% 51.4%
Temur Otters 212 63.1% 42.2%
Gruul Delirium 132 87.4% 38.3%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.