Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boros Tokens | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
| Mono-Red Aggro | ferran relat | 7-1 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | stanislau zubovich | 8-6 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | berk elçi | 6-2 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | barczek | 6-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | kazunarin | 7-5 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Roots , Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tempo , Boros Forge , Boros Monument , Boros Tokens , Dimir Midrange , Domain Zur Overlords
Meta Performance Analysis
Skullclamp ranks #611 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 12%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Skullclamp is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 8.52 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Skullclamp has a win rate of 56.0%, making it 18.1% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Elemental Blast | Instant | 5 | 69.2% | 1 |
| Bitterblossom | Kindred Enchantment — Faerie | 5 | 68.5% | 1 |
| Pyroblast | Instant | 6 | 68.1% | 1 |
| Grand Abolisher | Creature — Human Cleric | 5 | 62.3% | 1 |
| Silence | Instant | 5 | 62.3% | 1 |
| Legion Loyalist | Creature — Goblin Soldier | 6 | 59.7% | 0 |
| Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer | Legendary Creature — Monkey Pirate | 6 | 58.1% | 0 |
| Wild Slash | Instant | 10 | 57.7% | 1 |
| Shatterskull Smashing | Sorcery | 8 | 57.6% | 1 |
| Gut, True Soul Zealot | Legendary Creature — Goblin Shaman | 7 | 57.5% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Skullclamp than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 5 | 73.1% | 56.4% | +16.7% |
| Fireblast | Instant | 6 | 7 | 69.4% | 55.7% | +13.8% |
| Opposition Agent | Creature — Human Rogue | 3 | 5 | 68.2% | 55.0% | +13.2% |
| Toxic Deluge | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 65.4% | 54.3% | +11.1% |
| Seal of Fire | Enchantment | 1 | 5 | 68.8% | 58.0% | +10.7% |
| Chandra, Torch of Defiance | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 5 | 66.7% | 56.0% | +10.7% |
| Enlightened Tutor | Instant | 1 | 6 | 63.9% | 53.3% | +10.6% |
| Dauthi Voidwalker | Creature — Dauthi Rogue | 2 | 5 | 63.6% | 54.0% | +9.7% |
| Jeska's Will | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 69.6% | 60.0% | +9.6% |
| Searing Spear | Instant | 2 | 6 | 65.6% | 56.7% | +9.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono-Red Aggro | 17 | 3.9% | 48.2% |
| Izzet Prowess | 15 | 1.5% | 42.6% |
| Esper Pixie | 5 | 0.3% | 36.2% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 4 | 0.6% | 43.0% |
| Azorius Control | 3 | 0.6% | 44.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.