Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | jin liu | 10-4 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Mardu Siegebreaker , Mono Black Demons , Orzhov Lifegain , Orzhov Pixie , Orzhov Tokens
Meta Performance Analysis
Bitterblossom ranks #1993 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 39%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Bitterblossom is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 5.44 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Bitterblossom has a win rate of 50.7%, making it 6.8% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skullclamp | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 68.5% | 1 |
| Collective Brutality | Sorcery | 7 | 59.2% | 1 |
| Dauthi Voidwalker | Creature — Dauthi Rogue | 5 | 56.0% | 0 |
| Lingering Souls | Sorcery | 7 | 53.7% | 0 |
| Toxic Deluge | Sorcery | 7 | 53.2% | 1 |
| Diabolic Intent | Sorcery | 5 | 52.5% | 1 |
| Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 12 | 52.3% | 1 |
| Path to Exile | Instant | 6 | 51.7% | 0 |
| Fatal Push | Instant | 13 | 50.8% | 1 |
| Esper Sentinel | Artifact Creature — Human Soldier | 6 | 48.1% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Bitterblossom than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demonic Tutor | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 62.2% | 51.7% | +10.5% |
| Inquisition of Kozilek | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 61.3% | 53.6% | +7.7% |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 5 | 59.1% | 51.9% | +7.2% |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 54.3% | +5.7% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 6 | 56.5% | 51.6% | +4.9% |
| Fatal Push | Instant | 1 | 7 | 55.3% | 52.3% | +2.9% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 52.0% | 53.3% | -1.3% |
| Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 10 | 50.0% | 52.2% | -2.2% |
| Sword of Fire and Ice | Artifact — Equipment | 3 | 5 | 45.5% | 51.2% | -5.7% |
| Vindicate | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 42.5% | 49.3% | -6.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | 9 | 3.6% | 46.1% |
| Esper Pixie | 6 | 0.3% | 26.4% |
| Dimir Midrange | 2 | 0.1% | 21.4% |
| Mono Black Demons | 2 | 1.1% | 68.8% |
| Abzan Pixie | 1 | 2.6% | 33.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.