Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Satya, Aetherflux Genius ranks #2590 out of approximately 4236 cards in raw efficiency (top 61%).
Multi average: 48.6%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Satya, Aetherflux Genius is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 4.51 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Satya, Aetherflux Genius has a win rate of 72.2%, making it 51.9% better than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|
Cards that perform better with Satya, Aetherflux Genius than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elite Spellbinder | Creature — Human Cleric | 3 | 5 | 85.7% | 64.2% | +21.5% |
Subtlety | Creature — Elemental Incarnation | 4 | 8 | 84.6% | 65.2% | +19.4% |
Recruiter of the Guard | Creature — Human Soldier | 3 | 6 | 83.3% | 66.0% | +17.3% |
Skyclave Apparition | Creature — Kor Spirit | 3 | 10 | 81.5% | 65.3% | +16.2% |
Witch Enchanter | Creature — Human Warlock | 4 | 6 | 80.0% | 65.3% | +14.7% |
Ocelot Pride | Creature — Cat | 1 | 8 | 81.0% | 67.0% | +13.9% |
Static Prison | Enchantment | 1 | 9 | 82.8% | 69.2% | +13.5% |
Phlage, Titan of Fire's Fury | Legendary Creature — Elder Giant | 3 | 8 | 81.8% | 68.7% | +13.2% |
Esper Sentinel | Artifact Creature — Human Soldier | 1 | 7 | 78.3% | 65.4% | +12.8% |
Force Spike | Instant | 1 | 8 | 76.7% | 64.1% | +12.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Control | 15 | 4.3% | 47.1% |
Jeskai Oculus | 1 | 0.1% | 66.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.