Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | mohammedbinsalman | 8-1 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | lucas lim | 7-2 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | gas207298 | 6-0 | 1st in Daily Deck Club - Standard Showdown #1 @ Legacy at Home |
| Izzet Prowess | misplacedginger | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12774525 |
| Azorius Omniscience | raykuaza55 | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | carlos gómez galván | 7-1 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | shinya saito | 8-4 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | atsuhiro ishikawa | 8-4 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | takano kantaro | 8-4 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | yudaimiyano | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Flash , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tempo , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Oculus , Dimir Reanimator , Esper Pixie
Meta Performance Analysis
Subtlety ranks #3818 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 74%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Subtlety is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 3.26 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Subtlety has a win rate of 58.6%, making it 22.5% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amped Raptor | Creature — Dinosaur | 5 | 73.5% | 1 |
| Fading Hope | Instant | 5 | 65.3% | 0 |
| White Orchid Phantom | Creature — Spirit Knight | 5 | 63.5% | 1 |
| Lightning Greaves | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 63.4% | 1 |
| Volatile Stormdrake | Creature — Drake | 11 | 62.3% | 2 |
| Venser, Shaper Savant | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 9 | 62.0% | 2 |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 10 | 60.9% | 2 |
| Containment Priest | Creature — Human Cleric | 8 | 60.5% | 1 |
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 13 | 60.1% | 0 |
| Archmage's Charm | Instant | 10 | 58.7% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Subtlety than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reflector Mage | Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 7 | 86.4% | 58.6% | +27.8% |
| Ocelot Pride | Creature — Cat | 1 | 7 | 84.2% | 56.5% | +27.7% |
| Guide of Souls | Creature — Human Cleric | 1 | 8 | 84.6% | 57.7% | +26.9% |
| Tax Collector | Creature — Human Advisor | 2 | 5 | 91.7% | 65.4% | +26.2% |
| Static Prison | Enchantment | 1 | 8 | 84.6% | 59.1% | +25.5% |
| Broadside Bombardiers | Creature — Goblin Pirate | 3 | 9 | 81.5% | 57.1% | +24.4% |
| Amped Raptor | Creature — Dinosaur | 2 | 5 | 79.2% | 56.9% | +22.3% |
| Synth Eradicator | Artifact Creature — Synth Soldier | 3 | 8 | 84.6% | 64.6% | +20.1% |
| Satya, Aetherflux Genius | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 4 | 8 | 84.6% | 65.4% | +19.2% |
| Volatile Stormdrake | Creature — Drake | 2 | 10 | 78.9% | 61.0% | +17.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 87 | 8.8% | 43.1% |
| Jeskai Control | 44 | 12.7% | 42.2% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 22 | 3.4% | 42.0% |
| Esper Pixie | 6 | 0.3% | 52.6% |
| Dimir Midrange | 3 | 0.1% | 37.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.