Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Golgari Obliterator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono Black Demons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Rakdos Reanimator | koskadelli | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Dimir Bounce | oafmcnamara | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Rats
Meta Performance Analysis
Preacher of the Schism ranks #279 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 69%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.5%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Preacher of the Schism is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 13.46 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Preacher of the Schism has a win rate of 72.5%, making it 2.3% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piggy Bank | Artifact Creature — Boar Toy | 7 | 74.0% | 3 |
| Burst Lightning | Instant | 6 | 72.5% | 2 |
| Push/Pull | Sorcery // Sorcery | 5 | 72.1% | 1 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 9 | 69.6% | 2 |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 8 | 68.0% | 2 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 46 | 66.5% | 6 |
| Zombify | Sorcery | 7 | 63.9% | 1 |
| Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 36 | 61.5% | 13 |
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 75 | 61.5% | 9 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 27 | 60.4% | 6 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Preacher of the Schism than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 6 | 100.0% | 76.9% | +23.1% |
| Phyrexian Obliterator | Creature — Phyrexian Horror | 4 | 5 | 90.9% | 70.2% | +20.7% |
| The End | Instant | 4 | 6 | 88.9% | 75.4% | +13.4% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 10 | 84.5% | 73.7% | +10.8% |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 80.4% | 71.3% | +9.0% |
| Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 4 | 5 | 82.6% | 73.7% | +8.9% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 83.6% | 75.1% | +8.5% |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 9 | 83.0% | 74.7% | +8.3% |
| Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 7 | 11 | 83.6% | 75.6% | +8.0% |
| Blot Out | Instant | 3 | 8 | 82.6% | 75.3% | +7.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 1663 | 80.3% | 51.7% |
| Golgari Midrange | 603 | 77.6% | 45.3% |
| Dimir Bounce | 357 | 72.3% | 53.4% |
| Golgari Demons | 314 | 57.6% | 48.2% |
| Esper Pixie | 252 | 16.1% | 54.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.