Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Meta Performance Analysis
Mnemonic Betrayal ranks #3460 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 67%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Multi average: 46.8%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Mnemonic Betrayal is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 0.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Mnemonic Betrayal has a win rate of 48.4%, making it 2.0% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff | Legendary Creature — Halfling Rogue | 8 | 38.4% | 0 |
| Silence | Instant | 9 | 36.9% | 0 |
| Drannith Magistrate | Creature — Human Wizard | 8 | 35.3% | 0 |
| Mana Crypt | Artifact | 8 | 35.3% | 0 |
| Orcish Bowmasters | Creature — Orc Archer | 9 | 34.1% | 0 |
| Ranger-Captain of Eos | Creature — Human Soldier Ranger | 9 | 34.1% | 0 |
| Dispel | Instant | 5 | 33.9% | 0 |
| Mystical Tutor | Instant | 8 | 33.7% | 0 |
| Talisman of Progress | Artifact | 8 | 33.7% | 0 |
| Enlightened Tutor | Instant | 8 | 33.7% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Mnemonic Betrayal than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff | Legendary Creature — Halfling Rogue | 2 | 6 | 53.8% | 48.1% | +5.8% |
| Ranger-Captain of Eos | Creature — Human Soldier Ranger | 3 | 6 | 53.8% | 49.5% | +4.3% |
| Talion, the Kindly Lord | Legendary Creature — Faerie Noble | 4 | 5 | 52.9% | 49.2% | +3.7% |
| The One Ring | Legendary Artifact | 4 | 6 | 52.6% | 51.5% | +1.1% |
| Thassa's Oracle | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 2 | 8 | 48.4% | 47.5% | +0.9% |
| Orcish Bowmasters | Creature — Orc Archer | 2 | 7 | 51.9% | 51.5% | +0.4% |
| Chain of Vapor | Instant | 1 | 6 | 51.9% | 51.6% | +0.3% |
| Imperial Seal | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 48.3% | 48.2% | +0.1% |
| Archivist of Oghma | Creature — Halfling Cleric | 2 | 5 | 51.9% | 51.8% | +0.0% |
| Tainted Pact | Instant | 2 | 8 | 48.4% | 48.4% | -0.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 9 | 0.5% | 30.0% |
| Dimir Control | 1 | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1 | 0.1% | 62.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.