Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Aggro | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 21, 2025 |
Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Izzet Aggro , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus
Dispel ranks #166 out of approximately 1101 cards in raw efficiency (top 15%).
Blue average: 76.0%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Dispel is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Performance Efficiency: 58.93 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 77.7%. Dispel has a win rate of 78.6%, making it 1.2% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Exorcise | Sorcery | 28 | 85.2% | 17 |
Split Up | Sorcery | 16 | 84.5% | 10 |
Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 57 | 79.2% | 27 |
Day of Judgment | Sorcery | 33 | 79.1% | 14 |
Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 54 | 79.0% | 25 |
Abrade | Instant | 48 | 78.9% | 22 |
Flashfreeze | Instant | 14 | 78.9% | 6 |
Dragonologist | Creature — Human Wizard | 5 | 78.1% | 3 |
Ride's End | Instant | 25 | 77.9% | 10 |
Get Lost | Instant | 56 | 77.9% | 26 |
Cards that perform better with Dispel than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Snapcaster Mage | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 5 | 81.2% | 80.3% | +1.0% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Control | 43 | 63.2% | 79.0% |
Unknown Archetype | 15 | 4.1% | 62.1% |
2 | 8.0% | 35.7% | |
Jeskai Oculus | 2 | 0.6% | 71.4% |
Azorius Control | 1 | 0.2% | 100.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.