Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Unknown Archetype | kanister | 7-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | gerardo94 | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Legends , 4 Color Omniscience , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tokens Control , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Jace, the Perfected Mind ranks #334 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 81%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.8%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Jace, the Perfected Mind is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 9.46 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. Jace, the Perfected Mind has a win rate of 73.1%, making it 2.1% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get Out | Instant | 7 | 70.0% | 2 |
| Disfigure | Instant | 13 | 67.0% | 1 |
| Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 34 | 65.1% | 11 |
| Joust Through | Instant | 5 | 63.3% | 1 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 27 | 61.7% | 6 |
| Blot Out | Instant | 59 | 59.3% | 12 |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 32 | 59.1% | 13 |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 188 | 59.0% | 45 |
| Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 6 | 58.2% | 0 |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 7 | 57.9% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Jace, the Perfected Mind than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Noon | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 96.2% | 73.2% | +22.9% |
| Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 8 | 85.0% | 73.0% | +12.0% |
| Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 7 | 85.7% | 76.1% | +9.7% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 24 | 82.2% | 74.8% | +7.4% |
| Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 10 | 82.0% | 74.8% | +7.2% |
| Ill-Timed Explosion | Sorcery | 4 | 21 | 83.6% | 77.0% | +6.6% |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 79.2% | 73.0% | +6.2% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 21 | 81.8% | 75.8% | +6.0% |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 34 | 80.5% | 75.6% | +4.9% |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 7 | 28 | 79.6% | 74.8% | +4.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | 336 | 86.6% | 50.1% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 187 | 14.2% | 45.1% |
| Mono White Tokens | 96 | 15.7% | 41.9% |
| Dimir Demons | 88 | 86.3% | 47.1% |
| Dimir Control | 73 | 97.3% | 51.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.