Desperate Measures

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Rakdos Aggro bunnyfat 7-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765740

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
-2.1%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
78.5%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
+28.2%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
16
decks
Tournament Results
6
1st place
7
top 8
Average Copies
3.6
per deck
Archetypes Using This Card:

Gruul Leyline , Rakdos Aggro

Meta Performance Analysis

Desperate Measures ranks #68 out of approximately 410 cards in raw efficiency (top 17%).

Game Impact Factor
76.06
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
-1.25%

Black average: 74.6%

Performance compared to other Black cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Desperate Measures is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.

Recommended number of copies: 3

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
73.3
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
0.96x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 32.08 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.5%. Desperate Measures has a win rate of 73.3%, making it 4.2% worse than other 1-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Might of the Meek Instant 13 79.7% 6
Pyroclasm Sorcery 13 79.7% 6
Leyline of the Void Enchantment 11 78.6% 5
Emberheart Challenger Creature — Mouse Warrior 14 78.1% 6
Manifold Mouse Creature — Mouse Soldier 13 76.4% 5
Sunspine Lynx Creature — Elemental Cat 13 72.0% 5
Torch the Tower Instant 14 71.5% 6
Callous Sell-Sword Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure 16 70.8% 6
Heartfire Hero Creature — Mouse Soldier 16 70.8% 6
Monstrous Rage Instant 16 70.8% 6

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Desperate Measures than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Emberheart Challenger Creature — Mouse Warrior 2 14 76.2% 74.3% +1.9%
Pyroclasm Sorcery 2 13 77.9% 76.2% +1.7%
Might of the Meek Instant 1 13 77.9% 76.3% +1.6%
Leyline of the Void Enchantment 4 11 76.9% 75.7% +1.2%
Manifold Mouse Creature — Mouse Soldier 2 13 74.7% 74.1% +0.6%
Sunspine Lynx Creature — Elemental Cat 4 13 75.3% 75.2% +0.1%
Torch the Tower Instant 1 14 74.7% 75.0% -0.3%
Duress Sorcery 1 15 73.3% 73.8% -0.5%
Heartfire Hero Creature — Mouse Soldier 1 16 73.3% 74.2% -0.9%
Monstrous Rage Instant 1 16 73.3% 75.2% -1.8%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Gruul Leyline 13 6.8% 72.6%
Rakdos Aggro 3 4.3% 63.1%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.