Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | takuya aoki | 8-4 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess
Meta Performance Analysis
Deep Analysis ranks #3245 out of approximately 4236 cards in raw efficiency (top 77%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 52.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Deep Analysis is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 1.88 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Deep Analysis has a win rate of 52.6%, making it 10.7% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dawnbringer Cleric | Creature — Human Cleric | 5 | 50.0% | 0 |
| Last Breath | Instant | 5 | 49.4% | 0 |
| Thorn of the Black Rose | Creature — Human Assassin | 5 | 49.0% | 1 |
| The Modern Age | Enchantment — Saga | 9 | 47.6% | 0 |
| Mulldrifter | Creature — Elemental | 14 | 46.9% | 1 |
| Murmuring Mystic | Creature — Human Wizard | 5 | 44.9% | 0 |
| Preordain | Sorcery | 15 | 44.3% | 0 |
| Snap | Instant | 14 | 44.2% | 0 |
| Sunscape Familiar | Creature — Wall | 13 | 44.2% | 0 |
| Dust to Dust | Sorcery | 10 | 43.8% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Deep Analysis than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ponder | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 53.5% | 54.5% | -1.0% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 6 | 53.1% | 55.2% | -2.1% |
| Prohibit | Instant | 2 | 7 | 51.3% | 53.5% | -2.2% |
| Preordain | Sorcery | 1 | 11 | 52.5% | 54.9% | -2.4% |
| The Modern Age | Enchantment — Saga | 2 | 5 | 53.3% | 55.9% | -2.6% |
| Dust to Dust | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 53.6% | 56.6% | -3.0% |
| Snap | Instant | 2 | 8 | 52.4% | 55.6% | -3.2% |
| Brainstorm | Instant | 1 | 6 | 51.4% | 54.8% | -3.4% |
| God-Pharaoh's Faithful | Creature — Human Wizard | 1 | 6 | 50.0% | 53.6% | -3.6% |
| Hydroblast | Instant | 1 | 7 | 51.7% | 55.3% | -3.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | 12 | 1.8% | 46.8% |
| Dimir Midrange | 4 | 0.2% | 73.6% |
| Esper Pixie | 4 | 0.2% | 39.9% |
| Izzet Prowess | 4 | 0.4% | 46.3% |
| Dimir Bounce | 3 | 0.6% | 26.7% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.