Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | alexander rosdahl | 11-3 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | konstantin hittenberger | 10-4 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | mohammedbinsalman | 8-1 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
| Izzet Prowess | habsmithut | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | mcwright_ | 7-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | kazune kosaka | 7-2 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | takuya aoki | 8-4 | None |
| Azorius Omniscience | marco del pivo | 7-5 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess , Simic Terror
Meta Performance Analysis
Snap ranks #1306 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 25%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Snap is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 7.45 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Snap has a win rate of 58.2%, making it 22.6% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flesh Duplicate | Creature — Shapeshifter Rebel | 5 | 75.6% | 1 |
| Recruiter of the Guard | Creature — Human Soldier | 5 | 70.0% | 2 |
| Final Fortune | Instant | 6 | 70.0% | 1 |
| Jeweled Lotus | Artifact | 10 | 65.0% | 1 |
| Baneslayer Angel | Creature — Angel | 11 | 64.9% | 3 |
| Fading Hope | Instant | 5 | 64.8% | 0 |
| Reflector Mage | Creature — Human Wizard | 6 | 64.6% | 2 |
| Accumulated Knowledge | Instant | 5 | 63.9% | 1 |
| Overmaster | Sorcery | 7 | 63.9% | 1 |
| Lightning Greaves | Artifact — Equipment | 7 | 63.6% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Snap than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 6 | 76.9% | 57.5% | +19.5% |
| Consider | Instant | 1 | 8 | 71.1% | 58.0% | +13.1% |
| Pyrokinesis | Instant | 6 | 9 | 71.0% | 57.9% | +13.0% |
| Overmaster | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 72.7% | 60.0% | +12.7% |
| Blood Moon | Enchantment | 3 | 10 | 68.2% | 55.8% | +12.3% |
| Step Through | Sorcery | 5 | 5 | 70.0% | 57.7% | +12.3% |
| Spellseeker | Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 6 | 72.2% | 60.0% | +12.2% |
| Final Fortune | Instant | 2 | 5 | 71.0% | 58.8% | +12.2% |
| Heat Shimmer | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 71.4% | 59.4% | +12.1% |
| Harmonic Prodigy | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 8 | 71.8% | 60.3% | +11.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 113 | 11.5% | 41.4% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 84 | 12.8% | 44.1% |
| Jeskai Control | 70 | 20.2% | 43.2% |
| Esper Pixie | 49 | 2.6% | 37.3% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 26 | 3.5% | 35.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.