Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
| Esper Pixie | kazunarin | 7-5 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Meta Performance Analysis
Damn ranks #1881 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 37%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Damn is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 4.87 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Damn has a win rate of 55.2%, making it 16.1% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dark Petition | Sorcery | 7 | 69.1% | 3 |
| Bloodchief's Thirst | Sorcery | 7 | 68.1% | 3 |
| Skullclamp | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 65.2% | 1 |
| Walking Ballista | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 62.3% | 2 |
| Bolas's Citadel | Legendary Artifact | 5 | 60.0% | 2 |
| Wrath of God | Sorcery | 5 | 59.1% | 1 |
| Beseech the Queen | Sorcery | 6 | 57.7% | 2 |
| Nihil Spellbomb | Artifact | 7 | 57.7% | 1 |
| Charcoal Diamond | Artifact | 6 | 57.5% | 1 |
| Mind Stone | Artifact | 5 | 57.5% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Damn than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vindicate | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 69.6% | 51.5% | +18.1% |
| Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 57.1% | 54.4% | +2.8% |
| Solitude | Creature — Elemental Incarnation | 5 | 6 | 56.5% | 55.3% | +1.2% |
| Swords to Plowshares | Instant | 1 | 12 | 55.4% | 54.3% | +1.1% |
| Fatal Push | Instant | 1 | 7 | 55.6% | 54.5% | +1.0% |
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 9 | 56.7% | 56.5% | +0.2% |
| Sol Ring | Artifact | 1 | 9 | 55.6% | 55.5% | +0.0% |
| Demonic Tutor | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 52.9% | 53.9% | -0.9% |
| Demonic Consultation | Instant | 1 | 5 | 51.3% | 52.4% | -1.1% |
| Dauthi Voidwalker | Creature — Dauthi Rogue | 2 | 5 | 52.0% | 53.6% | -1.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 18 | 1.0% | 34.2% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 10 | 4.0% | 53.5% |
| Mono Black Demons | 10 | 5.2% | 54.2% |
| Dimir Midrange | 4 | 0.2% | 33.3% |
| Dimir Bounce | 3 | 0.6% | 70.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.