Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Rakdos Lizards | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | manohito | 6-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769901 |
| Jeskai Oculus | sixmp | 6-3 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Mice , Goblins , Grixis Monument , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Beanstalk , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Dinosaurs
Meta Performance Analysis
Chandra, Spark Hunter ranks #318 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 78%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 62.1%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Chandra, Spark Hunter is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 10.99 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Chandra, Spark Hunter has a win rate of 76.9%, making it 3.4% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abhorrent Oculus | Creature — Eye | 5 | 66.7% | 2 |
| Recommission | Sorcery | 5 | 66.7% | 2 |
| Helping Hand | Sorcery | 5 | 66.7% | 2 |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 7 | 50.7% | 2 |
| Fear of Missing Out | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 13 | 46.3% | 2 |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 8 | 43.5% | 2 |
| Duress | Sorcery | 6 | 42.5% | 0 |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 21 | 41.9% | 3 |
| Quag Feast | Sorcery | 5 | 41.0% | 0 |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 17 | 39.9% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Chandra, Spark Hunter than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 6 | 86.1% | 75.7% | +10.4% |
| Monstrous Rage | Instant | 1 | 6 | 86.1% | 76.3% | +9.8% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 7 | 85.5% | 76.4% | +9.1% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 9 | 83.0% | 74.7% | +8.3% |
| Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 2 | 6 | 86.1% | 78.0% | +8.2% |
| Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 86.1% | 78.5% | +7.6% |
| Burst Lightning | Instant | 1 | 7 | 83.7% | 76.4% | +7.3% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 11 | 82.6% | 75.4% | +7.2% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 7 | 83.7% | 76.9% | +6.8% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 11 | 82.1% | 75.3% | +6.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | 199 | 67.9% | 50.5% |
| Gruul Delirium | 31 | 20.5% | 37.2% |
| Gruul Aggro | 28 | 1.4% | 42.2% |
| Boros Burn | 27 | 6.9% | 30.6% |
| Red Deck Wins | 17 | 1.2% | 38.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.