Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-2 | None |
Jeskai Oculus | sixmp | 6-3 | None |
Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-3 | None |
Azorius Tempo , Bant Tempo , Boros Monument , Boros Recommission , Esper Oculus , Esper Repurposing , Jeskai Equipments , Jeskai Monument , Jeskai Oculus
Recommission ranks #152 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 37%).
White average: 74.4%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Recommission is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 21.84 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Recommission has a win rate of 75.7%, making it 1.4% better than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stock Up | Sorcery | 5 | 80.6% | 2 |
Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 40 | 75.0% | 16 |
Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 43 | 74.8% | 17 |
Duress | Sorcery | 8 | 73.5% | 3 |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 42 | 72.7% | 15 |
Cut Down | Instant | 6 | 70.0% | 2 |
Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 44 | 67.0% | 16 |
Pest Control | Sorcery | 15 | 64.1% | 5 |
Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 15 | 64.0% | 5 |
Ketramose, the New Dawn | Legendary Creature — God | 6 | 63.3% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Recommission than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 6 | 84.0% | 74.5% | +9.5% |
Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 13 | 80.8% | 74.4% | +6.4% |
Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 10 | 78.0% | 74.3% | +3.7% |
Into the Flood Maw | Instant | 1 | 8 | 80.5% | 77.0% | +3.5% |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 40 | 79.2% | 76.7% | +2.6% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 46 | 77.1% | 75.3% | +1.8% |
Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 2 | 40 | 76.4% | 74.8% | +1.6% |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 42 | 76.7% | 75.3% | +1.4% |
Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 49 | 75.9% | 74.7% | +1.2% |
Steamcore Scholar | Creature — Weird Detective | 3 | 46 | 76.2% | 75.4% | +0.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Tempo | 391 | 98.2% | 42.2% |
Jeskai Oculus | 288 | 98.3% | 52.8% |
Jeskai Monument | 28 | 90.3% | 61.9% |
Unknown Archetype | 9 | 2.5% | 63.9% |
Esper Oculus | 9 | 69.2% | 60.4% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.