Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Azorius Omniscience | dazai | 9-1 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Esper Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Red Deck Wins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Blink , 4 Color Legends , 5 Color Caves , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Reanimator , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash
Meta Performance Analysis
Beza, the Bounding Spring ranks #335 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 81%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.6%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Beza, the Bounding Spring is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 11.27 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. Beza, the Bounding Spring has a win rate of 72.9%, making it 2.4% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essence Scatter | Instant | 11 | 84.8% | 5 |
| Chandra, Hope's Beacon | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 26 | 81.9% | 11 |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 55 | 79.4% | 26 |
| Skrelv's Hive | Enchantment | 6 | 77.8% | 3 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 60 | 77.7% | 26 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 66 | 76.2% | 26 |
| Ill-Timed Explosion | Sorcery | 25 | 76.0% | 11 |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 43 | 75.9% | 16 |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 32 | 75.9% | 14 |
| Abrade | Instant | 60 | 74.7% | 24 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Beza, the Bounding Spring than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 87.5% | 73.8% | +13.7% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 25 | 81.6% | 75.7% | +5.9% |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 34 | 83.8% | 77.9% | +5.9% |
| Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 2 | 22 | 78.9% | 73.2% | +5.8% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 32 | 80.3% | 74.7% | +5.6% |
| Flashfreeze | Instant | 2 | 15 | 82.4% | 77.4% | +4.9% |
| Outrageous Robbery | Instant | 2 | 7 | 78.9% | 74.2% | +4.8% |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 2 | 56 | 80.9% | 76.2% | +4.7% |
| Chandra, Hope's Beacon | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 6 | 25 | 80.2% | 76.0% | +4.2% |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 45 | 79.6% | 75.5% | +4.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 947 | 71.9% | 47.6% |
| Mono White Tokens | 601 | 98.5% | 45.9% |
| Azorius Control | 376 | 96.9% | 53.9% |
| Unknown Archetype | 72 | 19.8% | 54.7% |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | 62 | 92.5% | 44.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.