Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | ignotus97 | 7-2 | None |
| Orzhov Tokens | ivan_draw_go | 6-1 | None |
| Azorius Flash | levunga21 | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Azorius Control | yungdingo | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Mono White Tokens | hermanomlg | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Convoke | dragonball | 6-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | gerardo94 | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Azorius Control , Azorius Enchantments , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Repurposing , Bant Gearhulk , Bant Synthesizer
Meta Performance Analysis
Wilt-Leaf Liege ranks #341 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 83%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 64.1%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Wilt-Leaf Liege is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 6.72 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. Wilt-Leaf Liege has a win rate of 69.4%, making it 7.0% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insidious Fungus | Creature — Fungus | 6 | 67.7% | 2 |
| Not on My Watch | Instant | 5 | 64.8% | 0 |
| Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 6 | 64.4% | 2 |
| Tender Wildguide | Creature — Possum Druid | 6 | 61.8% | 1 |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 9 | 57.9% | 5 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 9 | 57.5% | 2 |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 7 | 57.0% | 2 |
| Wylie Duke, Atiin Hero | Legendary Creature — Human Ranger | 7 | 51.5% | 1 |
| Aven Interrupter | Creature — Bird Rogue | 74 | 50.9% | 10 |
| Thrun, Breaker of Silence | Legendary Creature — Troll Shaman | 46 | 50.3% | 9 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Wilt-Leaf Liege than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 1 | 5 | 81.5% | 72.4% | +9.1% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 9 | 80.4% | 72.7% | +7.8% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 5 | 78.6% | 71.8% | +6.8% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 14 | 78.2% | 73.7% | +4.4% |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 1 | 5 | 78.6% | 75.4% | +3.2% |
| Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.8% | +3.2% |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 77.3% | 74.3% | +3.0% |
| Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 7 | 72.3% | 70.7% | +1.6% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 6 | 75.0% | 73.4% | +1.6% |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 5 | 22 | 74.1% | 73.3% | +0.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | 248 | 63.9% | 54.6% |
| Selesnya Cage | 122 | 48.0% | 46.6% |
| Esper Pixie | 76 | 4.8% | 65.5% |
| Mono White Tokens | 54 | 8.8% | 49.5% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 50 | 9.0% | 47.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.