Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Obliterator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Midrange | pnutz47 | 6-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | dr4ken | 6-2 | None |
| Domain Zur Overlords | eresopacaso | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Repurposing , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Domain Zur Overlords , Elves , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Deathtouch
Meta Performance Analysis
Wastewood Verge ranks #411 out of approximately 410 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 64.0%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Wastewood Verge is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 38.65 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Wastewood Verge has a win rate of 72.2%, making it 2.9% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient Cornucopia | Artifact | 5 | 81.3% | 2 |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 6 | 77.8% | 5 |
| Boon-Bringer Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Warrior | 5 | 76.6% | 2 |
| Spinewoods Armadillo | Creature — Armadillo | 6 | 76.2% | 4 |
| High Noon | Enchantment | 6 | 74.8% | 2 |
| Locust Spray | Instant | 9 | 71.5% | 4 |
| Lightning Helix | Instant | 5 | 70.6% | 1 |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 5 | 64.5% | 0 |
| Wrenn and Realmbreaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Wrenn | 17 | 64.0% | 2 |
| Season of Gathering | Sorcery | 19 | 61.7% | 7 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Wastewood Verge than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rot-Curse Rakshasa | Creature — Demon | 2 | 5 | 100.0% | 78.5% | +21.5% |
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 6 | 100.0% | 86.1% | +13.9% |
| Outrageous Robbery | Instant | 2 | 6 | 84.0% | 73.8% | +10.2% |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 7 | 85.7% | 75.7% | +10.0% |
| Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 4 | 5 | 82.6% | 73.6% | +9.0% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 26 | 79.1% | 72.3% | +6.8% |
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 3 | 9 | 82.2% | 75.5% | +6.7% |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 8 | 20 | 81.1% | 74.6% | +6.6% |
| Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 3 | 7 | 80.0% | 73.6% | +6.4% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 7 | 80.6% | 74.3% | +6.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 544 | 41.3% | 47.6% |
| Golgari Midrange | 296 | 37.7% | 49.1% |
| Golgari Graveyard | 45 | 83.3% | 36.9% |
| Unknown Archetype | 28 | 7.7% | 39.6% |
| Abzan Roots | 17 | 81.0% | 46.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.