Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| auzzie51 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769925 | |
| Izzet Spellslingers | -nausea- | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Unknown Archetype | kanister | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Control | kinghairy | 6-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | gerardo94 | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tempo , Domain Control , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Grixis Midrange , Grixis Monument , Grixis Reanimator , Grixis Teachings
Meta Performance Analysis
Thundering Falls ranks #414 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 64.1%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Thundering Falls is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 45.72 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Thundering Falls has a win rate of 77.9%, making it 5.1% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unable to Scream | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 95.0% | 4 |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 7 | 80.9% | 4 |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 53 | 79.2% | 25 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 58 | 79.0% | 27 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 60 | 77.7% | 26 |
| Flashfreeze | Instant | 18 | 76.2% | 7 |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 26 | 75.7% | 12 |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 36 | 75.1% | 16 |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 52 | 74.8% | 23 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 22 | 74.7% | 8 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Thundering Falls than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Noon | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 87.5% | 75.7% | +11.8% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 5 | 87.0% | 76.8% | +10.2% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 12 | 83.0% | 76.5% | +6.5% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 23 | 84.0% | 77.7% | +6.3% |
| Ephara's Dispersal | Instant | 3 | 8 | 83.3% | 77.3% | +6.1% |
| Monstrous Rage | Instant | 1 | 17 | 83.1% | 77.4% | +5.7% |
| Burst Lightning | Instant | 1 | 16 | 83.1% | 77.6% | +5.5% |
| Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 2 | 18 | 84.1% | 78.7% | +5.4% |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 2 | 19 | 83.7% | 78.3% | +5.4% |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 1 | 18 | 84.1% | 79.0% | +5.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | 245 | 81.4% | 52.2% |
| Jeskai Control | 54 | 94.7% | 72.6% |
| Unknown Archetype | 39 | 10.7% | 51.3% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 29 | 19.6% | 58.0% |
| Izzet Hellraiser | 16 | 100.0% | 24.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.