Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
4 Color Blink , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Superfriends , Domain Overlords , Domain Zur Overlords , Naya Forge , Selesnya Aggro , Selesnya Auras
Temple of Plenty ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Temple of Plenty is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 4.55 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Temple of Plenty has a win rate of 45.5%, making it 3.2% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Herd Migration | Sorcery | 5 | 52.1% | 1 |
Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 6 | 43.4% | 1 |
Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 5 | 41.5% | 0 |
Ride's End | Instant | 5 | 38.6% | 0 |
Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 7 | 37.2% | 1 |
Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 6 | 31.5% | 1 |
Alseid of Life's Bounty | Enchantment Creature — Nymph | 5 | 31.4% | 1 |
Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 11 | 30.0% | 1 |
Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 12 | 29.9% | 1 |
Day of Judgment | Sorcery | 13 | 28.8% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Temple of Plenty than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Selesnya Cage | 9 | 3.1% | 20.2% |
Selesnya Tokens | 5 | 41.7% | 0.0% |
Domain Zur Overlords | 5 | 0.3% | 32.1% |
Abzan Midrange | 3 | 20.0% | 0.0% |
Abzan Pixie | 3 | 7.7% | 23.8% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.