Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | kthanakit26 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Esper Pixie | gyrabbit47 | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Unknown Archetype | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Reanimator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Lifegain | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Blink , 4 Color Legends , 4 Color Omniscience , 4 Color Repurposing , 5 Color Battles , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Abzan Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Swamp ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Swamp is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 38.91 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Swamp has a win rate of 73.7%, making it 0.9% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 11 | 85.7% | 6 |
| Cityscape Leveler | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 80.0% | 4 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 22 | 75.4% | 13 |
| Swiftfoot Boots | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 72.2% | 2 |
| Lyra Dawnbringer | Legendary Creature — Angel | 14 | 71.4% | 10 |
| Delney, Streetwise Lookout | Legendary Creature — Human Scout | 5 | 71.1% | 3 |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 8 | 70.8% | 6 |
| Dewdrop Cure | Sorcery | 9 | 69.5% | 5 |
| Goldvein Hydra | Creature — Hydra | 5 | 69.3% | 2 |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 19 | 68.4% | 6 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Swamp than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 2 | 6 | 100.0% | 75.9% | +24.1% |
| Rot-Curse Rakshasa | Creature — Demon | 2 | 6 | 100.0% | 78.3% | +21.7% |
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 3 | 7 | 95.0% | 76.1% | +18.9% |
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 7 | 100.0% | 86.9% | +13.1% |
| The Speed Demon | Legendary Creature — Demon | 5 | 6 | 100.0% | 86.9% | +13.1% |
| Strategic Betrayal | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 100.0% | 86.9% | +13.1% |
| Inevitable Defeat | Instant | 4 | 5 | 100.0% | 86.9% | +13.1% |
| Withering Torment | Instant | 3 | 6 | 95.7% | 82.7% | +13.0% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 19 | 84.9% | 74.7% | +10.3% |
| Ancient Vendetta | Sorcery | 4 | 7 | 92.9% | 83.3% | +9.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 2071 | 100.0% | 50.5% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1229 | 93.7% | 49.0% |
| Esper Pixie | 1175 | 75.2% | 55.4% |
| Golgari Midrange | 776 | 99.9% | 44.6% |
| Golgari Demons | 545 | 100.0% | 46.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.