Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Deck Wins | luffydochapeudepalha | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
| auzzie51 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769925 | |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Red Deck Wins | kablewire | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
| Red Deck Wins | numberonenoob | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | sanpop | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769073 |
| Rakdos Aggro | bunnyfat | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765740 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 7-1 | None |
| Jund Delirium | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Big Red , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Mice , Boros Monument , Boros Recommission , Cats Aggro , Goblins
Meta Performance Analysis
Sunspine Lynx ranks #324 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 78%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 63.8%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sunspine Lynx is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 12.56 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. Sunspine Lynx has a win rate of 76.9%, making it 3.1% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 6 | 83.6% | 3 |
| Magebane Lizard | Creature — Lizard | 19 | 65.1% | 3 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 8 | 63.8% | 1 |
| Tectonic Hazard | Sorcery | 5 | 59.4% | 1 |
| Case of the Crimson Pulse | Enchantment — Case | 48 | 55.9% | 6 |
| Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 19 | 52.6% | 0 |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 106 | 52.4% | 14 |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 74 | 51.8% | 5 |
| Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 108 | 51.1% | 15 |
| Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 111 | 50.2% | 15 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Sunspine Lynx than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 7 | 92.9% | 76.0% | +16.8% |
| Shock | Instant | 1 | 9 | 95.8% | 80.8% | +15.1% |
| Destroy Evil | Instant | 2 | 5 | 89.5% | 75.0% | +14.5% |
| Ral, Crackling Wit | Legendary Planeswalker — Ral | 4 | 7 | 88.4% | 78.2% | +10.2% |
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 2 | 14 | 88.0% | 78.3% | +9.7% |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 86.8% | 77.4% | +9.4% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 9 | 84.3% | 76.5% | +7.9% |
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 26 | 86.2% | 78.7% | +7.5% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 12 | 83.6% | 76.4% | +7.1% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 61 | 82.7% | 76.6% | +6.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Deck Wins | 1153 | 82.9% | 53.6% |
| Gruul Aggro | 642 | 30.8% | 44.4% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 76 | 51.4% | 80.0% |
| Boros Burn | 70 | 17.6% | 32.7% |
| Gruul Delirium | 39 | 25.3% | 22.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.