Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | badgods | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12772693 |
Izzet Prowess | luís felippe rossello lima | 8-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | neil cruz | 6-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | pierre marzano | 7-1 | None |
Izzet Prowess | kazuya murakami | 8-4 | None |
Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Oculus
Sublime Epiphany ranks #4633 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 90%).
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sublime Epiphany is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 2.55 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 6 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Sublime Epiphany has a win rate of 59.1%, making it 23.5% better than other 6-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Volcanic Spite | Instant | 5 | 63.0% | 1 |
Aether Gust | Instant | 6 | 60.1% | 1 |
Consider | Instant | 7 | 56.0% | 0 |
Make Disappear | Instant | 11 | 53.3% | 1 |
Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 9 | 52.3% | 1 |
Expressive Iteration | Sorcery | 5 | 51.5% | 0 |
Fable of the Mirror-Breaker | Enchantment — Saga | 15 | 50.7% | 1 |
Stern Lesson | Instant | 10 | 49.8% | 1 |
Indomitable Creativity | Sorcery | 13 | 49.6% | 1 |
Torrential Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 17 | 49.4% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Sublime Epiphany than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Volcanic Spite | Instant | 2 | 5 | 79.4% | 60.8% | +18.6% |
Shatterskull Smashing | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 70.0% | 58.3% | +11.7% |
Consider | Instant | 1 | 5 | 69.0% | 58.4% | +10.6% |
Brotherhood's End | Sorcery | 3 | 8 | 67.4% | 58.3% | +9.1% |
Mystical Dispute | Instant | 3 | 6 | 66.7% | 57.7% | +9.0% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 17 | 66.7% | 57.8% | +8.9% |
Sea Gate Restoration | Sorcery | 7 | 6 | 66.7% | 58.6% | +8.1% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 11 | 66.0% | 58.0% | +8.1% |
Jwari Disruption | Instant | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 59.6% | +7.0% |
Make Disappear | Instant | 2 | 11 | 65.5% | 59.7% | +5.9% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Prowess | 23 | 2.3% | 42.6% |
Jeskai Oculus | 4 | 0.5% | 28.8% |
Esper Pixie | 3 | 0.2% | 25.0% |
Dimir Midrange | 2 | 0.1% | 25.0% |
Azorius Omniscience | 1 | 0.1% | 40.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.