Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Jeskai Convoke , Orzhov Pixie
Meta Performance Analysis
Springleaf Drum ranks #126 out of approximately 1172 cards in raw efficiency (top 11%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 80.7%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Springleaf Drum is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 63.97 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 78.3%. Springleaf Drum has a win rate of 85.3%, making it 8.9% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ornithopter | Artifact Creature — Thopter | 7 | 67.3% | 5 |
| Shadowspear | Legendary Artifact — Equipment | 6 | 61.9% | 4 |
| Esper Sentinel | Artifact Creature — Human Soldier | 6 | 54.8% | 3 |
| Colossus Hammer | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 54.3% | 3 |
| Pithing Needle | Artifact | 5 | 54.3% | 3 |
| Puresteel Paladin | Creature — Human Knight | 5 | 54.3% | 3 |
| Sanctifier en-Vec | Creature — Human Cleric | 5 | 54.3% | 3 |
| Sigarda's Aid | Enchantment | 5 | 54.3% | 3 |
| Stoneforge Mystic | Creature — Kor Artificer | 5 | 54.3% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Springleaf Drum than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanctifier en-Vec | Creature — Human Cleric | 2 | 5 | 88.2% | 82.2% | +6.0% |
| Stoneforge Mystic | Creature — Kor Artificer | 2 | 5 | 88.2% | 85.4% | +2.9% |
| Ornithopter | Artifact Creature — Thopter | 0 | 7 | 92.6% | 90.3% | +2.3% |
| Puresteel Paladin | Creature — Human Knight | 2 | 5 | 88.2% | 86.8% | +1.5% |
| Sigarda's Aid | Enchantment | 1 | 5 | 88.2% | 86.8% | +1.5% |
| Shadowspear | Legendary Artifact — Equipment | 1 | 6 | 90.9% | 90.3% | +0.6% |
| Colossus Hammer | Artifact — Equipment | 1 | 5 | 88.2% | 88.1% | +0.1% |
| Pithing Needle | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 88.2% | 88.3% | -0.0% |
| Esper Sentinel | Artifact Creature — Human Soldier | 1 | 6 | 79.2% | 84.0% | -4.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | 2 | 0.5% | 50.0% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 2 | 0.5% | 100.0% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 2 | 0.4% | 50.0% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 2 | 2.2% | 64.3% |
| 1 | 3.9% | 100.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.