Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Artifacts | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Flash | levunga21 | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Jeskai Control | kinghairy | 6-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | gerardo94 | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Legends , 4 Color Repurposing , 5 Color Caves , Abzan Beanstalk , Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Angels , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras
Meta Performance Analysis
Split Up ranks #251 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 62%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.4%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Split Up is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 12.98 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Split Up has a win rate of 76.3%, making it 2.9% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 11 | 91.2% | 8 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 12 | 87.8% | 8 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 16 | 83.0% | 9 |
| Urza's Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 10 | 73.4% | 4 |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 5 | 73.3% | 2 |
| Flashfreeze | Instant | 5 | 73.1% | 1 |
| Abrade | Instant | 17 | 71.1% | 8 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 21 | 66.3% | 7 |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 30 | 63.0% | 10 |
| Clay-Fired Bricks | Artifact // Artifact | 24 | 62.9% | 10 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Split Up than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 10 | 89.6% | 78.1% | +11.4% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 17 | 87.2% | 75.9% | +11.3% |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 89.7% | 79.0% | +10.7% |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 14 | 84.0% | 76.2% | +7.8% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 5 | 83.3% | 76.0% | +7.4% |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 4 | 10 | 82.0% | 74.8% | +7.2% |
| Kutzil's Flanker | Creature — Cat Warrior | 3 | 14 | 83.8% | 76.9% | +6.8% |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 2 | 13 | 84.9% | 78.2% | +6.7% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 8 | 79.2% | 74.1% | +5.0% |
| Day of Judgment | Sorcery | 4 | 16 | 78.6% | 73.6% | +5.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 549 | 41.8% | 47.6% |
| Mono White Tokens | 505 | 83.1% | 43.3% |
| Azorius Tempo | 227 | 57.0% | 46.1% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 196 | 35.2% | 39.4% |
| Azorius Flash | 190 | 84.1% | 58.7% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.