Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Domain Zur Overlords , Selesnya Beanstalk , Selesnya Cage , Selesnya Toxic
Meta Performance Analysis
Spider Umbra ranks #629 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 12%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 42.4%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Spider Umbra is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 4.10 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Spider Umbra has a win rate of 49.3%, making it 4.0% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silhana Ledgewalker | Creature — Elf Rogue | 6 | 54.6% | 1 |
| Dismember | Instant | 8 | 51.2% | 1 |
| Keen Sense | Enchantment — Aura | 6 | 48.3% | 1 |
| Spirit Mantle | Enchantment — Aura | 11 | 47.9% | 1 |
| Unflinching Courage | Enchantment — Aura | 9 | 46.6% | 1 |
| Suppression Field | Enchantment | 7 | 46.0% | 1 |
| Stony Silence | Enchantment | 13 | 45.0% | 1 |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 13 | 43.0% | 1 |
| Hyena Umbra | Enchantment — Aura | 14 | 41.8% | 1 |
| Gladecover Scout | Creature — Elf Scout | 14 | 41.8% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Spider Umbra than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suppression Field | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 61.3% | 50.9% | +10.4% |
| Silhana Ledgewalker | Creature — Elf Rogue | 2 | 5 | 64.5% | 55.5% | +9.0% |
| Keen Sense | Enchantment — Aura | 1 | 5 | 59.3% | 54.3% | +5.0% |
| Dismember | Instant | 3 | 7 | 59.5% | 54.7% | +4.8% |
| Spirit Link | Enchantment — Aura | 1 | 7 | 54.3% | 50.2% | +4.1% |
| Unflinching Courage | Enchantment — Aura | 3 | 9 | 54.0% | 50.5% | +3.5% |
| Gladecover Scout | Creature — Elf Scout | 1 | 12 | 49.3% | 48.3% | +0.9% |
| Spirit Mantle | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 9 | 53.2% | 52.5% | +0.8% |
| Slippery Bogle | Creature — Beast | 1 | 12 | 49.3% | 48.9% | +0.3% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 11 | 50.8% | 50.5% | +0.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 10 | 0.6% | 46.0% |
| Selesnya Beanstalk | 2 | 2.7% | 18.8% |
| Selesnya Cage | 1 | 0.3% | 37.5% |
| Selesnya Toxic | 1 | 25.0% | 50.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.