Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Abzan Midrange , Bant Gearhulk , Domain Zur Overlords , Golgari Counters , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Midrange , Gruul Surprise , Jund Beanstalk
Scrapshooter ranks #214 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 53%).
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Scrapshooter is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 66.67 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Scrapshooter has a win rate of 100.0%, making it 34.8% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wrenn and Realmbreaker | Legendary Planeswalker — Wrenn | 5 | 63.3% | 1 |
Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 6 | 59.4% | 2 |
Haywire Mite | Artifact Creature — Insect | 6 | 55.3% | 1 |
Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 6 | 51.4% | 0 |
Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 13 | 50.0% | 1 |
Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 6 | 50.0% | 2 |
Hollow Marauder | Creature — Specter Rogue | 5 | 50.0% | 2 |
Overwhelming Remorse | Instant | 5 | 50.0% | 2 |
Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 50.0% | 2 |
Souls of the Lost | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 50.0% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Scrapshooter than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Graveyard | 34 | 63.0% | 39.5% |
Gruul Delirium | 18 | 11.9% | 28.7% |
Golgari Midrange | 13 | 1.7% | 24.7% |
Mono Green Stompy | 8 | 57.1% | 12.5% |
Bant Gearhulk | 7 | 41.2% | 31.1% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.