Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | mohammedbinsalman | 8-1 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | yuta takahashi | 7-5 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Meta Performance Analysis
Pteramander ranks #126 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 2%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Pteramander is an exceptional card that should be considered a format staple.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 12.31 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Pteramander has a win rate of 61.5%, making it 29.9% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazen Borrower | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 8 | 56.7% | 0 |
| Blood Moon | Enchantment | 6 | 46.8% | 0 |
| Daze | Instant | 6 | 46.8% | 0 |
| Preordain | Sorcery | 6 | 46.8% | 1 |
| Force of Will | Instant | 6 | 46.8% | 0 |
| Forked Bolt | Sorcery | 6 | 46.8% | 1 |
| Spectral Sailor | Creature — Spirit Pirate | 7 | 44.6% | 1 |
| Gitaxian Probe | Sorcery | 5 | 44.4% | 1 |
| Pyrokinesis | Instant | 5 | 44.4% | 1 |
| Mausoleum Wanderer | Creature — Spirit | 5 | 44.4% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Pteramander than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preordain | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 67.7% | 59.3% | +8.5% |
| Blood Moon | Enchantment | 3 | 6 | 65.6% | 57.5% | +8.1% |
| Forked Bolt | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 67.7% | 60.0% | +7.7% |
| Young Pyromancer | Creature — Human Shaman | 2 | 5 | 65.4% | 58.2% | +7.2% |
| Daze | Instant | 2 | 6 | 65.6% | 58.6% | +7.0% |
| Ponder | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 65.6% | 58.6% | +7.0% |
| True-Name Nemesis | Creature — Merfolk Rogue | 3 | 6 | 65.6% | 58.7% | +6.9% |
| Force of Will | Instant | 5 | 6 | 65.6% | 58.8% | +6.9% |
| Lightning Bolt | Instant | 1 | 6 | 65.6% | 58.8% | +6.8% |
| Brainstorm | Instant | 1 | 6 | 65.6% | 58.9% | +6.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 9 | 0.9% | 44.0% |
| Dimir Midrange | 2 | 0.1% | 58.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.