Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Elves , Golgari Deathtouch , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Leyline , Mono Green Stompy , Selesnya Rabbits , Simic Aggro , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Overprotect ranks #127 out of approximately 405 cards in raw efficiency (top 31%).
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Overprotect is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 32.14 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. Overprotect has a win rate of 85.7%, making it 14.9% better than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 27 | 67.0% | 3 |
Count on Luck | Enchantment | 25 | 66.8% | 3 |
Torch the Witness | Sorcery | 8 | 65.6% | 1 |
Might of the Meek | Instant | 98 | 63.8% | 25 |
Pick Your Poison | Sorcery | 33 | 59.3% | 4 |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 118 | 59.1% | 24 |
Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 163 | 55.5% | 32 |
Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 157 | 54.8% | 43 |
Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 159 | 54.7% | 43 |
Cacophony Scamp | Creature — Phyrexian Goblin Warrior | 165 | 54.0% | 43 |
Cards that perform better with Overprotect than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Aggro | 145 | 7.0% | 43.4% |
Gruul Leyline | 98 | 51.9% | 60.6% |
Gruul Delirium | 12 | 8.0% | 34.6% |
Selesnya Rabbits | 5 | 31.2% | 43.0% |
Unknown Archetype | 3 | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.