Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Esper Pixie | mei0024 | 6-1 | None |
| Esper Pixie | johnny_hobbs | 6-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | misplacedginger | 6-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | varo | 6-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | misplacedginger | 6-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765740 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Auras , Azorius Enchantments , Bant Auras , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Esper Pixie , Mono White Tokens , Naya Auras , Orzhov Enchantments , Orzhov Pixie
Meta Performance Analysis
Optimistic Scavenger ranks #83 out of approximately 410 cards in raw efficiency (top 20%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.6%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Optimistic Scavenger is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 31.39 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.5%. Optimistic Scavenger has a win rate of 69.6%, making it 9.0% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Become Brutes | Sorcery | 6 | 94.4% | 5 |
| Tectonic Hazard | Sorcery | 7 | 83.4% | 4 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 7 | 80.4% | 2 |
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 5 | 80.0% | 4 |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 17 | 76.3% | 12 |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 9 | 75.0% | 3 |
| Mabel, Heir to Cragflame | Legendary Creature — Mouse Soldier | 24 | 74.7% | 13 |
| Kellan, Planar Trailblazer | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout | 31 | 74.7% | 20 |
| Lightning Helix | Instant | 74 | 72.0% | 39 |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 12 | 68.7% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Optimistic Scavenger than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 73.1% | 68.6% | +4.5% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 10 | 74.1% | 73.0% | +1.1% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 16 | 72.3% | 71.9% | +0.4% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 41 | 69.3% | 69.7% | -0.3% |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 32 | 68.9% | 69.3% | -0.4% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 26 | 70.6% | 71.4% | -0.7% |
| Entity Tracker | Creature — Human Scout | 3 | 27 | 70.5% | 71.4% | -0.9% |
| No More Lies | Instant | 2 | 44 | 69.4% | 70.3% | -0.9% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 10 | 73.3% | 74.3% | -1.0% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 35 | 71.8% | 73.0% | -1.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 1284 | 81.3% | 54.2% |
| Boros Auras | 64 | 97.0% | 55.5% |
| Azorius Auras | 61 | 95.3% | 36.2% |
| Boros Burn | 32 | 8.0% | 60.8% |
| Selesnya Auras | 11 | 100.0% | 32.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.