Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | dazai | 9-1 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Azorius Omniscience | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Omniscience | theasiankid | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Omniscience , Azorius Omniscience , Bant Omniscience , Golgari Manifest , Jeskai Omniscience , Mono Blue Reenact , Mono Green Ramp , Selesnya Surprise , Sultai Emergence
Meta Performance Analysis
Omniscience ranks #405 out of approximately 405 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.8%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Omniscience is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 3.16 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 10 mana, the average win rate in the format is 72.9%. Omniscience has a win rate of 73.8%, making it 1.2% better than other 10-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 18 | 79.5% | 8 |
| Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 20 | 78.8% | 9 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 29 | 76.2% | 11 |
| Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 28 | 74.5% | 11 |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 32 | 73.6% | 10 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 51 | 60.6% | 10 |
| Change the Equation | Instant | 20 | 57.4% | 6 |
| Defabricate | Instant | 72 | 57.2% | 21 |
| Haunt the Network | Sorcery | 93 | 57.1% | 19 |
| Soul Partition | Instant | 41 | 57.1% | 8 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Omniscience than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 5 | 78.9% | 74.3% | +4.6% |
| Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 2 | 28 | 75.6% | 73.1% | +2.5% |
| Season of Weaving | Sorcery | 6 | 7 | 78.6% | 76.2% | +2.4% |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 6 | 80.0% | 77.7% | +2.3% |
| Change the Equation | Instant | 2 | 17 | 73.3% | 71.9% | +1.5% |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 2 | 18 | 77.5% | 76.3% | +1.1% |
| Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 2 | 20 | 76.9% | 75.9% | +1.0% |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 1 | 5 | 72.4% | 71.7% | +0.7% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 27 | 73.8% | 73.3% | +0.5% |
| Ephara's Dispersal | Instant | 3 | 41 | 74.7% | 74.5% | +0.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | 353 | 100.0% | 51.2% |
| Sultai Emergence | 18 | 48.6% | 22.2% |
| Unclassified | 11 | 5.4% | 11.2% |
| Unknown Archetype | 2 | 0.6% | 37.5% |
| Mono Blue Reenact | 2 | 100.0% | 16.7% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.