Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | kthanakit26 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Esper Pixie | gyrabbit47 | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Esper Pixie | rnicof | 7-1 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Esper Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Esper Pixie | gianhunter | 7-2 | None |
| Unknown Archetype | elvin7 | 7-2 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | sam_lewin | 7-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | mei0024 | 6-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Pixie , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Flash , Bant Gearhulk , Boros Recommission , Esper Paragon , Esper Pixie , Jeskai Aggro , Jeskai Convoke
Meta Performance Analysis
Nurturing Pixie ranks #78 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 19%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.6%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Nurturing Pixie is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 35.63 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.3%. Nurturing Pixie has a win rate of 71.8%, making it 5.9% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 15 | 86.5% | 10 |
| Pawpatch Formation | Instant | 9 | 74.6% | 4 |
| Into the Flood Maw | Instant | 10 | 70.9% | 5 |
| Knight of Grace | Creature — Human Knight | 53 | 70.4% | 27 |
| Regal Bunnicorn | Creature — Rabbit Unicorn | 41 | 67.7% | 17 |
| Warden of the Inner Sky | Creature — Human Soldier | 43 | 67.6% | 17 |
| Protect the Negotiators | Instant | 46 | 67.2% | 17 |
| Raise the Past | Sorcery | 24 | 67.1% | 8 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 12 | 65.6% | 6 |
| Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 8 | 65.4% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Nurturing Pixie than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 87.1% | 74.2% | +12.9% |
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 5 | 84.0% | 73.0% | +11.0% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 10 | 83.0% | 72.7% | +10.3% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 18 | 81.3% | 74.9% | +6.4% |
| Enduring Innocence | Enchantment Creature — Sheep Glimmer | 3 | 6 | 79.4% | 73.5% | +5.9% |
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 5 | 79.3% | 73.8% | +5.5% |
| Novice Inspector | Creature — Human Detective | 1 | 6 | 79.3% | 75.0% | +4.3% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 16 | 76.5% | 73.0% | +3.4% |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 1 | 13 | 79.1% | 75.7% | +3.4% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 23 | 77.6% | 74.6% | +3.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 1582 | 99.9% | 54.3% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 77 | 100.0% | 46.7% |
| Selesnya Cage | 45 | 17.7% | 50.6% |
| Azorius Flash | 37 | 16.4% | 70.1% |
| Esper Paragon | 18 | 100.0% | 48.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.