Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Esper Pixie | kthanakit26 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Esper Pixie | gyrabbit47 | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Esper Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Artifacts | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | ignotus97 | 7-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | ejk | 6-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Enchantments , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Omniscience
Meta Performance Analysis
No More Lies ranks #196 out of approximately 405 cards in raw efficiency (top 48%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Multi average: 67.9%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, No More Lies is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 16.11 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. No More Lies has a win rate of 70.9%, making it 5.0% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Essence Scatter | Instant | 12 | 81.9% | 5 |
| Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 13 | 78.1% | 6 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 12 | 74.4% | 7 |
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 9 | 73.6% | 4 |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 24 | 69.9% | 12 |
| Ajani, Caller of the Pride | Legendary Planeswalker — Ajani | 18 | 69.6% | 4 |
| Shrouded Shepherd | Creature — Spirit Warrior // Sorcery — Adventure | 18 | 68.0% | 4 |
| Raise the Past | Sorcery | 19 | 67.6% | 5 |
| Unsummon | Instant | 16 | 66.8% | 7 |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 69 | 66.3% | 22 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with No More Lies than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 6 | 84.2% | 72.3% | +11.9% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 6 | 83.3% | 73.1% | +10.2% |
| Enduring Curiosity | Enchantment Creature — Cat Glimmer | 4 | 5 | 78.6% | 71.7% | +6.9% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 5 | 78.6% | 72.2% | +6.3% |
| Protect the Negotiators | Instant | 2 | 5 | 78.6% | 73.4% | +5.1% |
| Sunfall | Sorcery | 5 | 14 | 75.7% | 71.6% | +4.1% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 9 | 76.5% | 72.6% | +3.9% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 33 | 76.0% | 72.4% | +3.7% |
| Warden of the Inner Sky | Creature — Human Soldier | 1 | 5 | 78.6% | 75.6% | +3.0% |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 71.6% | 68.8% | +2.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 1077 | 69.0% | 55.5% |
| Azorius Control | 375 | 98.7% | 52.3% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 68 | 23.2% | 65.6% |
| Azorius Flash | 53 | 23.4% | 61.0% |
| Azorius Glyph | 52 | 45.2% | 44.7% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.