Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | antoine cointe | 9-5 | None |
Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Golgari Midrange
Nethergoyf ranks #168 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 3%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Nethergoyf is an exceptional card that should be considered a format staple.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 21.71 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Nethergoyf has a win rate of 57.9%, making it 22.2% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nihil Spellbomb | Artifact | 6 | 58.9% | 1 |
Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 8 | 48.4% | 1 |
Mishra's Bauble | Artifact | 7 | 47.2% | 1 |
Toxic Deluge | Sorcery | 8 | 46.0% | 1 |
Sheoldred's Edict | Instant | 6 | 43.1% | 0 |
Fatal Push | Instant | 9 | 39.5% | 1 |
Orcish Bowmasters | Creature — Orc Archer | 8 | 39.1% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Nethergoyf than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sheoldred's Edict | Instant | 2 | 5 | 63.2% | 55.9% | +7.2% |
Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 61.3% | 55.7% | +5.5% |
Mishra's Bauble | Artifact | 0 | 5 | 62.5% | 57.2% | +5.3% |
Orcish Bowmasters | Creature — Orc Archer | 2 | 6 | 59.3% | 56.2% | +3.0% |
Toxic Deluge | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 56.7% | 55.3% | +1.4% |
Fatal Push | Instant | 1 | 7 | 55.9% | 55.9% | -0.0% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Midrange | 4 | 0.5% | 58.0% |
Dimir Midrange | 3 | 0.1% | 42.3% |
1 | 1.6% | 0.0% | |
Dimir Bounce | 1 | 0.2% | 28.6% |
Esper Pixie | 1 | 0.1% | 42.9% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.