Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Obliterator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Golgari Midrange | pnutz47 | 6-2 | None |
Golgari Midrange | dr4ken | 6-2 | None |
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Abzan Reanimator , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Demons , Golgari Doubling , Golgari Landfall , Golgari Lifedrain Combo
Mosswood Dreadknight ranks #189 out of approximately 410 cards in raw efficiency (top 46%).
Green average: 66.0%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Mosswood Dreadknight is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 22.81 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 75.0%. Mosswood Dreadknight has a win rate of 71.3%, making it 4.9% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Breach the Multiverse | Sorcery | 15 | 68.1% | 8 |
Vinereap Mentor | Creature — Squirrel Druid | 8 | 67.9% | 3 |
Royal Treatment | Instant | 35 | 65.0% | 11 |
Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 27 | 60.4% | 4 |
Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 17 | 60.3% | 4 |
Stab | Instant | 34 | 56.6% | 7 |
Season of Gathering | Sorcery | 20 | 56.0% | 6 |
Keen-Eyed Curator | Creature — Raccoon Scout | 12 | 54.6% | 1 |
The Speed Demon | Legendary Creature — Demon | 31 | 53.0% | 11 |
Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 21 | 52.9% | 9 |
Cards that perform better with Mosswood Dreadknight than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 8 | 85.7% | 75.3% | +10.4% |
Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 8 | 17 | 80.9% | 74.1% | +6.8% |
The End | Instant | 4 | 5 | 80.0% | 74.2% | +5.8% |
Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 4 | 13 | 78.5% | 73.9% | +4.6% |
Choking Miasma | Sorcery | 3 | 13 | 80.3% | 75.9% | +4.4% |
Phyrexian Obliterator | Creature — Phyrexian Horror | 4 | 5 | 73.3% | 69.6% | +3.7% |
Intimidation Tactics | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 73.1% | 69.4% | +3.6% |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 21 | 76.7% | 73.8% | +2.9% |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 17 | 75.0% | 72.3% | +2.7% |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 74.4% | 71.7% | +2.7% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Midrange | 707 | 90.1% | 45.4% |
Golgari Demons | 538 | 98.7% | 47.0% |
Unknown Archetype | 19 | 5.2% | 36.0% |
Golgari Obliterator | 14 | 93.3% | 49.0% |
Abzan Midrange | 5 | 45.5% | 16.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.