Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | kthanakit26 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Esper Pixie | houseofmanamtg | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Esper Pixie | gyrabbit47 | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778 |
| Esper Pixie | rnicof | 7-1 | None |
| Mono Black Demons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Rakdos Sacrifice | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Esper Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Unknown Archetype | elvin7 | 7-2 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | sam_lewin | 7-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | gianhunter | 7-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Midrange , Esper Enchantments , Esper Paragon , Esper Pixie , Golgari Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Momentum Breaker ranks #190 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 46%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.4%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Momentum Breaker is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 19.68 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.8%. Momentum Breaker has a win rate of 72.4%, making it 3.2% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clockwork Percussionist | Artifact Creature — Monkey Toy | 7 | 82.7% | 4 |
| Bottomless Pool/Locker Room | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 26 | 74.0% | 10 |
| Final Vengeance | Sorcery | 10 | 71.2% | 5 |
| Disturbing Mirth | Enchantment | 9 | 70.6% | 4 |
| Change the Equation | Instant | 5 | 70.3% | 2 |
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 9 | 68.0% | 4 |
| Faerie Mastermind | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 11 | 65.5% | 3 |
| Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 5 | 64.8% | 1 |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 105 | 64.3% | 30 |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 78 | 62.3% | 16 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Momentum Breaker than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 11 | 83.3% | 73.0% | +10.3% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 8 | 82.9% | 73.8% | +9.1% |
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 5 | 79.3% | 74.1% | +5.2% |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 1 | 12 | 80.0% | 76.0% | +4.0% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 6 | 76.0% | 72.3% | +3.7% |
| Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.7% | +3.3% |
| No More Lies | Instant | 2 | 67 | 74.7% | 71.8% | +2.9% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 25 | 75.9% | 73.2% | +2.8% |
| Kaito, Bane of Nightmares | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 4 | 61 | 75.3% | 72.8% | +2.5% |
| Get Out | Instant | 2 | 5 | 80.6% | 78.2% | +2.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 822 | 51.9% | 53.7% |
| Dimir Bounce | 87 | 17.5% | 45.9% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 68 | 88.3% | 50.5% |
| Unknown Archetype | 27 | 7.4% | 25.1% |
| Dimir Midrange | 19 | 0.9% | 43.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.