Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Aggro | mogged | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
Rakdos Aggro | bunnyfat | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765740 |
Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Mice , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Spellslingers , Rakdos Aggro , Rakdos Sacrifice , Red Deck Wins , Unclassified
Might of the Meek ranks #33 out of approximately 410 cards in raw efficiency (top 8%).
Red average: 63.9%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Might of the Meek is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 46.65 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.5%. Might of the Meek has a win rate of 79.3%, making it 3.7% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 18 | 80.9% | 9 |
Desperate Measures | Instant | 13 | 79.7% | 6 |
Hearth Elemental | Creature — Elemental // Sorcery — Adventure | 11 | 79.2% | 5 |
Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 7 | 77.5% | 3 |
Fiery Annihilation | Instant | 7 | 71.0% | 1 |
Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 65 | 70.5% | 13 |
Duress | Sorcery | 50 | 69.2% | 13 |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 87 | 68.8% | 24 |
Count on Luck | Enchantment | 32 | 66.2% | 5 |
Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 47 | 64.8% | 21 |
Cards that perform better with Might of the Meek than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pawpatch Formation | Instant | 2 | 16 | 83.3% | 77.4% | +6.0% |
Burst Lightning | Instant | 1 | 19 | 82.1% | 78.3% | +3.8% |
Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 1 | 12 | 81.1% | 77.4% | +3.7% |
Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 15 | 80.5% | 78.2% | +2.3% |
Questing Druid | Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 17 | 81.6% | 79.3% | +2.3% |
Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 1 | 34 | 79.3% | 77.2% | +2.1% |
Emberheart Challenger | Creature — Mouse Warrior | 2 | 34 | 79.3% | 77.3% | +2.0% |
Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 1 | 19 | 78.4% | 76.6% | +1.8% |
Desperate Measures | Instant | 1 | 13 | 77.9% | 76.3% | +1.6% |
Leyline of Resonance | Enchantment | 4 | 16 | 80.2% | 78.8% | +1.4% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Leyline | 157 | 81.8% | 59.0% |
Gruul Aggro | 134 | 6.4% | 53.3% |
Rakdos Aggro | 34 | 49.3% | 51.9% |
Red Deck Wins | 12 | 0.9% | 34.2% |
Boros Mice | 4 | 19.1% | 52.8% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.