Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Dimir Bounce | oafmcnamara | 7-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Cauldron , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Malicious Eclipse ranks #287 out of approximately 410 cards in raw efficiency (top 70%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.6%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Malicious Eclipse is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 14.09 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.3%. Malicious Eclipse has a win rate of 71.0%, making it 4.4% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locust Spray | Instant | 5 | 64.8% | 2 |
| Harvester of Misery | Creature — Spirit | 6 | 54.1% | 1 |
| Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 6 | 51.6% | 1 |
| Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 20 | 51.4% | 5 |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 8 | 51.2% | 2 |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 27 | 50.5% | 5 |
| Phantom Interference | Instant | 9 | 50.2% | 2 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 11 | 48.3% | 2 |
| Three Steps Ahead | Instant | 19 | 47.9% | 3 |
| Quick Study | Instant | 7 | 47.5% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Malicious Eclipse than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 6 | 87.5% | 75.0% | +12.5% |
| Blot Out | Instant | 3 | 6 | 82.6% | 73.7% | +8.9% |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 72.1% | +7.9% |
| The End | Instant | 4 | 5 | 81.2% | 74.1% | +7.2% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 19 | 78.6% | 73.3% | +5.4% |
| Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.6% | +3.4% |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 14 | 74.5% | 71.5% | +2.9% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 5 | 75.0% | 72.9% | +2.1% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 7 | 72.7% | 71.9% | +0.9% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 5 | 75.0% | 74.2% | +0.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 914 | 43.9% | 48.9% |
| Dimir Bounce | 222 | 44.8% | 45.0% |
| Golgari Midrange | 67 | 8.5% | 28.2% |
| Dimir Demons | 61 | 59.8% | 62.7% |
| Dimir Control | 50 | 66.7% | 52.2% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.