Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mardu Tokens | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Tokens | ivan_draw_go | 6-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Caves , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Superfriends , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Control , Esper Oculus , Esper Pixie , Esper Reanimator
Meta Performance Analysis
Kaya, Intangible Slayer ranks #411 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Multi average: 67.2%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Kaya, Intangible Slayer is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 2.57 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 7 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.6%. Kaya, Intangible Slayer has a win rate of 63.0%, making it 14.3% worse than other 7-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binding Negotiation | Sorcery | 5 | 69.3% | 0 |
| Ancient Vendetta | Sorcery | 7 | 65.8% | 0 |
| Intimidation Tactics | Sorcery | 7 | 64.8% | 0 |
| Parting Gust | Instant | 8 | 63.8% | 0 |
| Soul Search | Sorcery | 10 | 61.1% | 1 |
| Urza's Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 11 | 60.7% | 0 |
| Ketramose, the New Dawn | Legendary Creature — God | 11 | 57.4% | 0 |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 11 | 57.0% | 0 |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 17 | 49.8% | 3 |
| Cease/Desist | Instant // Sorcery | 24 | 39.7% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Kaya, Intangible Slayer than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 6 | 65.8% | 65.1% | +0.7% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 67.3% | 68.5% | -1.2% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 6 | 56.2% | 68.0% | -11.8% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 6 | 55.6% | 68.0% | -12.4% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 63 | 4.8% | 45.8% |
| Abzan Beanstalk | 18 | 51.4% | 14.7% |
| Orzhov Control | 15 | 68.2% | 35.5% |
| Orzhov Tokens | 14 | 46.7% | 53.7% |
| Unknown Archetype | 13 | 3.6% | 35.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.