Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Esper Pixie | kthanakit26 | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881 |
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Azorius Omniscience | dazai | 9-1 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | -nausea- | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Blink , 4 Color Omniscience , 4 Color Repurposing , 5 Color Battles , 5 Color Legends , Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Angels
Meta Performance Analysis
Island ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 63.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Island is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 41.36 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.4%. Island has a win rate of 75.4%, making it 1.3% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 27 | 83.3% | 16 |
| Slaughter Singer | Creature — Phyrexian Cleric | 5 | 80.0% | 4 |
| Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 21 | 79.8% | 10 |
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 39 | 79.7% | 19 |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 74 | 77.7% | 34 |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 14 | 77.6% | 8 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 51 | 77.3% | 22 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 111 | 76.0% | 53 |
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 33 | 75.7% | 11 |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 24 | 74.3% | 9 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Island than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 88.0% | 72.5% | +15.5% |
| Auroral Procession | Instant | 2 | 5 | 100.0% | 87.7% | +12.3% |
| Magmatic Hellkite | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 5 | 94.1% | 82.8% | +11.3% |
| Optimistic Scavenger | Creature — Human Scout | 1 | 6 | 81.2% | 72.5% | +8.8% |
| Defabricate | Instant | 2 | 5 | 90.9% | 83.1% | +7.8% |
| Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 13 | 86.9% | 80.7% | +6.2% |
| Bounce Off | Instant | 1 | 24 | 87.1% | 81.2% | +5.9% |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 9 | 80.0% | 74.2% | +5.8% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 57 | 80.7% | 74.9% | +5.8% |
| Mockingbird | Creature — Bird Bard | 1 | 16 | 83.0% | 77.4% | +5.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 2059 | 99.4% | 50.4% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1269 | 96.7% | 49.1% |
| Esper Pixie | 521 | 33.4% | 53.6% |
| Dimir Bounce | 485 | 98.2% | 49.4% |
| Azorius Tempo | 397 | 99.8% | 41.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.