Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Spellslingers | sanpop | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Izzet Spellslingers | alemilan19 | 6-2 | None |
Izzet Spellslingers | nammersquats | 6-2 | None |
4 Color Omniscience , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Soldiers , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo
Into the Flood Maw ranks #32 out of approximately 410 cards in raw efficiency (top 8%).
Blue average: 72.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Into the Flood Maw is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 58.94 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.5%. Into the Flood Maw has a win rate of 78.9%, making it 3.1% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Slick Sequence | Instant | 7 | 85.7% | 5 |
Dive Down | Instant | 7 | 84.5% | 4 |
Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 12 | 82.2% | 6 |
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 9 | 81.5% | 4 |
Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 52 | 81.3% | 27 |
Shrouded Shepherd | Creature — Spirit Warrior // Sorcery — Adventure | 8 | 80.4% | 5 |
Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 7 | 79.9% | 3 |
Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 48 | 79.7% | 23 |
Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 52 | 79.5% | 26 |
Monstrous Rage | Instant | 53 | 79.3% | 26 |
Cards that perform better with Into the Flood Maw than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slick Sequence | Instant | 2 | 14 | 88.3% | 79.3% | +9.0% |
Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 33 | 85.9% | 77.3% | +8.5% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 14 | 85.3% | 77.7% | +7.6% |
Shore Up | Instant | 1 | 26 | 86.4% | 80.7% | +5.7% |
Bounce Off | Instant | 1 | 15 | 87.8% | 82.8% | +5.0% |
Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 13 | 86.9% | 82.1% | +4.8% |
This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 9 | 81.2% | 76.9% | +4.4% |
Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 70 | 81.6% | 77.6% | +3.9% |
Abrade | Instant | 2 | 24 | 84.0% | 80.2% | +3.9% |
Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 5 | 80.0% | 76.2% | +3.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Tempo | 153 | 38.4% | 30.1% |
Jeskai Oculus | 136 | 45.8% | 45.5% |
Izzet Spellslingers | 96 | 65.3% | 75.0% |
Simic Terror | 92 | 30.0% | 41.9% |
Temur Otters | 80 | 23.8% | 42.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.