Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Red Deck Wins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Boros Equipments | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Convoke | dragonball | 6-2 | None |
| Red Deck Wins | lsmd | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | manohito | 6-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769901 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Boros Aggro , Boros Angels , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Control , Boros Convoke , Boros Discover , Boros Equipments
Meta Performance Analysis
Inspiring Vantage ranks #414 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 64.1%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Inspiring Vantage is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 41.21 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Inspiring Vantage has a win rate of 74.4%, making it 0.3% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 5 | 82.0% | 3 |
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 47 | 75.7% | 19 |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 51 | 75.0% | 20 |
| Geological Appraiser | Creature — Human Artificer | 9 | 73.8% | 5 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 53 | 73.1% | 19 |
| Chimil, the Inner Sun | Legendary Artifact | 8 | 71.3% | 2 |
| Bulwark Ox | Creature — Ox Mount | 6 | 66.7% | 3 |
| Etali's Favor | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 66.1% | 2 |
| Count on Luck | Enchantment | 11 | 64.9% | 3 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 9 | 63.5% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Inspiring Vantage than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 3 | 5 | 100.0% | 76.0% | +24.0% |
| Sunspine Lynx | Creature — Elemental Cat | 4 | 6 | 89.5% | 75.7% | +13.8% |
| Warleader's Call | Enchantment | 3 | 5 | 100.0% | 87.2% | +12.8% |
| Monstrous Rage | Instant | 1 | 5 | 83.9% | 75.6% | +8.2% |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 80.6% | 74.2% | +6.5% |
| Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 3 | 7 | 80.0% | 73.7% | +6.3% |
| Break the Spell | Instant | 1 | 5 | 80.8% | 77.0% | +3.8% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 15 | 76.4% | 74.0% | +2.4% |
| Regal Bunnicorn | Creature — Rabbit Unicorn | 2 | 7 | 78.0% | 76.2% | +1.8% |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 1 | 5 | 78.8% | 77.3% | +1.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Convoke | 557 | 99.8% | 48.5% |
| Boros Burn | 398 | 100.0% | 47.5% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 301 | 100.0% | 52.8% |
| Red Deck Wins | 235 | 16.9% | 50.1% |
| Boros Auras | 66 | 100.0% | 56.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.