Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | screenwriterny | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12773970 |
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 | |
| Orzhov Sacrifice | istillarte12 | 8-6 | None |
| Azorius Artifacts | vitor mendonca | 6-2 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | tase yuya | 7-5 | None |
| Orzhov Pixie | kenta imai | 6-6 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tempo , Boros Tokens , Domain Zur Overlords , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus
Meta Performance Analysis
Hushbringer ranks #1506 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 29%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 47.0%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Hushbringer is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 4.36 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Hushbringer has a win rate of 56.7%, making it 19.4% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Hushbringer than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gingerbrute | Artifact Creature — Food Golem | 1 | 7 | 68.4% | 56.6% | +11.8% |
| Apostle of Purifying Light | Creature — Human Cleric | 2 | 5 | 68.2% | 60.4% | +7.8% |
| March of Otherworldly Light | Instant | 1 | 9 | 61.1% | 54.6% | +6.5% |
| Kaldra Compleat | Legendary Artifact — Equipment | 7 | 6 | 60.0% | 55.2% | +4.8% |
| All That Glitters | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 10 | 60.0% | 55.6% | +4.4% |
| Cartouche of Solidarity | Enchantment — Aura Cartouche | 1 | 7 | 56.1% | 51.9% | +4.2% |
| Giver of Runes | Creature — Kor Cleric | 1 | 6 | 60.0% | 56.1% | +3.9% |
| Shadowspear | Legendary Artifact — Equipment | 1 | 12 | 58.3% | 54.5% | +3.8% |
| Alseid of Life's Bounty | Enchantment Creature — Nymph | 1 | 6 | 55.1% | 51.5% | +3.6% |
| Ingenious Smith | Creature — Human Artificer | 2 | 5 | 60.7% | 58.4% | +2.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | 6 | 2.4% | 65.2% |
| Azorius Control | 5 | 1.1% | 14.3% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 4 | 0.6% | 41.9% |
| Selesnya Cage | 3 | 1.1% | 28.6% |
| Azorius Artifacts | 2 | 5.1% | 62.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.