Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Meta Performance Analysis
Herd Heirloom ranks #232 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 56%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.9%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Herd Heirloom is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 5.71 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.8%. Herd Heirloom has a win rate of 57.1%, making it 23.6% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 5 | 67.9% | 1 |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 6 | 58.2% | 1 |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 6 | 52.0% | 1 |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 51.2% | 1 |
| Overlord of the Boilerbilges | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 6 | 51.2% | 1 |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 6 | 51.2% | 1 |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 6 | 51.2% | 1 |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 6 | 51.2% | 1 |
| Get Lost | Instant | 6 | 43.9% | 1 |
| Ride's End | Instant | 6 | 43.9% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Herd Heirloom than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 1 | 5 | 65.7% | 63.2% | +2.6% |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 65.7% | 65.3% | +0.4% |
| Ride's End | Instant | 5 | 6 | 60.0% | 63.4% | -3.4% |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 6 | 60.0% | 63.4% | -3.4% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 60.0% | 63.5% | -3.5% |
| Overlord of the Boilerbilges | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 6 | 6 | 60.0% | 64.0% | -4.0% |
| Leyline Binding | Enchantment | 6 | 6 | 60.0% | 64.5% | -4.5% |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 6 | 60.0% | 65.0% | -5.0% |
| Get Lost | Instant | 2 | 6 | 60.0% | 65.1% | -5.1% |
| Beza, the Bounding Spring | Legendary Creature — Elemental Elk | 4 | 6 | 59.5% | 65.0% | -5.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 6 | 0.5% | 51.2% |
| Golgari Obliterator | 4 | 25.0% | 38.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.