Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Midrange | dr4ken | 6-2 | None |
4 Color Legends , 5 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Roots , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Elves , Golgari Analyst , Golgari Beanstalk
Glissa Sunslayer ranks #285 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 70%).
Multi average: 67.3%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Glissa Sunslayer is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 18.52 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Glissa Sunslayer has a win rate of 71.4%, making it 3.7% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vinereap Mentor | Creature — Squirrel Druid | 8 | 67.9% | 3 |
Keen-Eyed Curator | Creature — Raccoon Scout | 10 | 63.6% | 1 |
Royal Treatment | Instant | 33 | 60.0% | 9 |
Stab | Instant | 24 | 59.3% | 4 |
Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 20 | 55.9% | 4 |
Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 14 | 52.2% | 0 |
Abyssal Harvester | Creature — Demon Warlock | 5 | 51.7% | 1 |
Render Inert | Sorcery | 88 | 50.9% | 15 |
The Swarmweaver | Legendary Artifact Creature — Scarecrow | 15 | 48.4% | 1 |
Blot Out | Instant | 205 | 48.3% | 31 |
Cards that perform better with Glissa Sunslayer than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 73.1% | 72.7% | +0.4% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 8 | 72.4% | 72.2% | +0.2% |
Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 6 | 71.4% | 71.5% | -0.1% |
Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 71.6% | -0.2% |
Tear Asunder | Instant | 2 | 9 | 73.1% | 73.4% | -0.4% |
Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 75.4% | -0.4% |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 7 | 71.4% | 72.5% | -1.1% |
Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 9 | 71.4% | 72.6% | -1.2% |
Sentinel of the Nameless City | Creature — Merfolk Warrior Scout | 3 | 5 | 68.8% | 70.2% | -1.5% |
Nissa, Ascended Animist | Legendary Planeswalker — Nissa | 7 | 5 | 71.4% | 73.0% | -1.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Demons | 540 | 99.1% | 46.7% |
Golgari Midrange | 352 | 45.3% | 37.8% |
Unknown Archetype | 15 | 4.1% | 34.4% |
Elves | 9 | 52.9% | 17.0% |
Golgari Deathtouch | 9 | 75.0% | 26.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.