Flickerwisp

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Orzhov Pixie piotr szyiński 9-5 None
Orzhov Pixie tlacaelel campos 6-2 None

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
-5.1%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
56.6%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
-19.2%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
27
decks
Tournament Results
2
1st place
5
top 8
Average Copies
2.9
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Flickerwisp ranks #3328 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 65%).

Game Impact Factor
50.48
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
+2.59%

White average: 47.0%

Performance compared to other White cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Flickerwisp is an underperforming card in the current meta.

Recommended number of copies: 1

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
16.7
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
0.35x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 3.09 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Flickerwisp has a win rate of 50.0%, making it 5.4% better than other 3-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Boggart Trawler Creature — Goblin 5 69.5% 1
Overlord of the Balemurk Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror 5 69.5% 1
White Orchid Phantom Creature — Spirit Knight 7 64.0% 1
Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd Legendary Creature — Dog 6 63.5% 1
Aven Interrupter Creature — Bird Rogue 6 62.7% 1
Wrath of the Skies Sorcery 7 60.4% 1
Emperor of Bones Creature — Skeleton Noble 7 60.4% 1
Ephemerate Instant 8 57.0% 1
Fatal Push Instant 10 54.8% 1
Faerie Macabre Creature — Faerie Rogue 7 53.2% 2

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Flickerwisp than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Faerie Macabre Creature — Faerie Rogue 3 6 78.9% 51.3% +27.7%
Wrath of the Skies Sorcery 2 6 76.2% 58.3% +17.9%
Emperor of Bones Creature — Skeleton Noble 2 6 76.2% 59.0% +17.1%
White Orchid Phantom Creature — Spirit Knight 2 6 77.4% 61.0% +16.4%
Thoughtseize Sorcery 1 7 66.7% 51.8% +14.9%
Ephemerate Instant 1 6 65.2% 53.5% +11.7%
Orcish Bowmasters Creature — Orc Archer 2 6 62.5% 52.3% +10.2%
Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd Legendary Creature — Dog 2 5 63.2% 56.2% +7.0%
Fatal Push Instant 1 9 58.8% 52.0% +6.9%
Witch Enchanter Creature — Human Warlock 4 8 60.0% 53.8% +6.2%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Orzhov Pixie 17 6.8% 44.8%
Mono White Tokens 3 0.5% 22.2%
Jeskai Control 2 0.6% 0.0%
Selesnya Gearhulk 1 8.3% 40.0%
Azorius Control 1 0.2% 50.0%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.