Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | marco fabrizi | 11-3 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | mohammedbinsalman | 8-1 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | moritz hoff | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | gigachadsigmamale | 6-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12774495 |
| Jeskai Control | matteo barca | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | jan marc marino | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Omniscience , Izzet Cauldron , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus , Temur Beanstalk , Temur Prowess
Meta Performance Analysis
Fire/Ice ranks #3848 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 75%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Fire/Ice is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 2.51 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Fire/Ice has a win rate of 55.6%, making it 16.2% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venser, Shaper Savant | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 5 | 62.8% | 1 |
| Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd | Legendary Creature — Dog | 5 | 53.8% | 0 |
| Phlage, Titan of Fire's Fury | Legendary Creature — Elder Giant | 5 | 53.8% | 0 |
| Cavalcade of Calamity | Enchantment | 11 | 53.6% | 0 |
| Containment Priest | Creature — Human Cleric | 7 | 53.6% | 0 |
| Mystical Dispute | Instant | 5 | 53.5% | 0 |
| Jwari Disruption | Instant | 5 | 53.1% | 0 |
| Murktide Regent | Creature — Dragon | 9 | 52.5% | 0 |
| Grim Lavamancer | Creature — Human Wizard | 17 | 52.2% | 1 |
| Umezawa's Jitte | Legendary Artifact — Equipment | 7 | 52.0% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Fire/Ice than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Umezawa's Jitte | Legendary Artifact — Equipment | 2 | 5 | 79.2% | 54.5% | +24.7% |
| Fable of the Mirror-Breaker | Enchantment — Saga | 3 | 8 | 68.8% | 55.5% | +13.2% |
| Adeline, Resplendent Cathar | Legendary Creature — Human Knight | 3 | 6 | 60.0% | 49.7% | +10.3% |
| Oust | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 64.5% | 54.2% | +10.3% |
| Blue Elemental Blast | Instant | 1 | 5 | 66.7% | 56.5% | +10.2% |
| Seasoned Dungeoneer | Creature — Human Warrior | 4 | 7 | 63.6% | 53.5% | +10.1% |
| No More Lies | Instant | 2 | 7 | 65.0% | 54.9% | +10.1% |
| Kraum, Ludevic's Opus | Legendary Creature — Zombie Horror | 5 | 5 | 75.0% | 65.3% | +9.7% |
| Electrolyze | Instant | 3 | 8 | 64.7% | 55.2% | +9.5% |
| Red Elemental Blast | Instant | 1 | 8 | 62.9% | 53.7% | +9.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 54 | 5.5% | 38.8% |
| Jeskai Control | 33 | 9.5% | 41.2% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 3 | 0.4% | 25.0% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 1 | 0.1% | 50.0% |
| Izzet Cauldron | 1 | 50.0% | 50.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.