Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Spellslingers | _falcon_ | 7-1 | None |
Domain Breaching | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 21, 2025 |
Rakdos Reanimator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 21, 2025 |
Gruul Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 21, 2025 |
Domain Breaching , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Dragons , Izzet Spellslingers , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus , Rakdos Aggro , Rakdos Reanimator , Red Deck Wins
Fable of the Mirror-Breaker ranks #715 out of approximately 1172 cards in raw efficiency (top 61%).
Red average: 78.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Fable of the Mirror-Breaker is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 18.70 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 77.5%. Fable of the Mirror-Breaker has a win rate of 84.2%, making it 8.6% better than other 3-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fury | Creature — Elemental Incarnation | 5 | 91.2% | 3 |
Abrade | Instant | 6 | 85.7% | 3 |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 5 | 82.9% | 2 |
Strangle | Sorcery | 6 | 75.8% | 2 |
Spikefield Hazard | Instant | 10 | 73.0% | 4 |
Fiery Impulse | Instant | 5 | 71.8% | 3 |
Magma Opus | Instant | 6 | 71.4% | 4 |
Expressive Iteration | Sorcery | 6 | 71.4% | 3 |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 9 | 67.3% | 5 |
Shatterskull Smashing | Sorcery | 8 | 67.3% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Fable of the Mirror-Breaker than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negate | Instant | 2 | 10 | 86.5% | 80.1% | +6.5% |
Mystical Dispute | Instant | 3 | 5 | 88.2% | 84.4% | +3.9% |
Fury | Creature — Elemental Incarnation | 5 | 5 | 91.9% | 88.7% | +3.2% |
Hullbreaker Horror | Creature — Kraken Horror | 7 | 5 | 88.2% | 86.0% | +2.2% |
Make Disappear | Instant | 2 | 8 | 86.5% | 84.9% | +1.5% |
Strangle | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 86.5% | 85.2% | +1.3% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 9 | 82.0% | 81.2% | +0.8% |
Abrade | Instant | 2 | 6 | 82.9% | 82.8% | +0.2% |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 6 | 80.6% | 81.1% | -0.5% |
Fiery Impulse | Instant | 1 | 5 | 88.0% | 88.8% | -0.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Izzet Spellslingers | 7 | 3.8% | 61.5% |
Jeskai Oculus | 5 | 1.5% | 85.7% |
Red Deck Wins | 3 | 0.2% | 69.8% |
Jeskai Control | 2 | 2.9% | 71.4% |
Temur Dragons | 1 | 50.0% | 0.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.