Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | alexander rosdahl | 11-3 | None |
| Domain Zur Overlords | federico alberto ciancia | 10-4 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
| Izzet Prowess | mcwright_ | 7-2 | None |
| Esper Pixie | matthieu tassa | 8-6 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Golgari Midrange , Golgari Reanimator , Gruul Leyline
Meta Performance Analysis
Exotic Orchard ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Exotic Orchard is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 12.95 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Exotic Orchard has a win rate of 60.4%, making it 28.6% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spark Double | Creature — Illusion | 5 | 80.0% | 3 |
| Thrummingbird | Creature — Phyrexian Bird Horror | 5 | 72.4% | 2 |
| Gamble | Sorcery | 7 | 67.0% | 1 |
| Frantic Search | Instant | 5 | 65.6% | 1 |
| Twinflame | Sorcery | 5 | 63.9% | 0 |
| Hullbreaker Horror | Creature — Kraken Horror | 5 | 63.3% | 2 |
| Phantasmal Image | Creature — Illusion | 7 | 62.3% | 1 |
| Animate Dead | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 60.8% | 1 |
| Red Elemental Blast | Instant | 5 | 60.4% | 0 |
| Simian Spirit Guide | Creature — Ape Spirit | 5 | 60.4% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Exotic Orchard than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Verdict | Sorcery | 4 | 6 | 82.6% | 58.0% | +24.6% |
| Cursed Totem | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 78.6% | 60.0% | +18.6% |
| Talisman of Creativity | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 77.4% | 60.9% | +16.5% |
| Gut Shot | Instant | 1 | 5 | 75.0% | 59.8% | +15.2% |
| Frantic Search | Instant | 3 | 5 | 72.2% | 57.0% | +15.2% |
| Sink into Stupor | Instant | 3 | 6 | 72.7% | 58.3% | +14.4% |
| The One Ring | Legendary Artifact | 4 | 10 | 71.4% | 57.5% | +13.9% |
| Mox Amber | Legendary Artifact | 0 | 7 | 73.8% | 60.4% | +13.4% |
| Twinflame | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 73.3% | 60.4% | +13.0% |
| Dualcaster Mage | Creature — Human Wizard | 3 | 5 | 73.3% | 60.7% | +12.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esper Pixie | 18 | 1.0% | 40.4% |
| Izzet Prowess | 13 | 1.3% | 53.8% |
| Jeskai Control | 10 | 2.9% | 31.8% |
| Domain Zur Overlords | 6 | 0.4% | 75.6% |
| Dimir Midrange | 2 | 0.1% | 58.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.